<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to use blogging software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php</link>
	<description>A new spin on where business agility can take you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php/comment-page-1#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input on ExpressionEngine Matthew.  Most of my clients have been expressing an interest in &#039;doing it themselves&#039;.  Most blogging engines leave them cold because of their limited ability to WYSIWIG the content as they go.

They want the ability to write in a familiar environment - Word usually - and copy and paste the outcome.  So far, that means Plone or Joomla.  Yet, when I see the content the editors produce - filled with font tags, extra p tags and numerous other tags that make it look like how they want - but fill up the HTML with crud.

I&#039;ll check out ExpressionEngine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input on ExpressionEngine Matthew.  Most of my clients have been expressing an interest in &#8216;doing it themselves&#8217;.  Most blogging engines leave them cold because of their limited ability to WYSIWIG the content as they go.</p>
<p>They want the ability to write in a familiar environment &#8211; Word usually &#8211; and copy and paste the outcome.  So far, that means Plone or Joomla.  Yet, when I see the content the editors produce &#8211; filled with font tags, extra p tags and numerous other tags that make it look like how they want &#8211; but fill up the HTML with crud.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll check out ExpressionEngine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Huebert</title>
		<link>http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Huebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agilenavigator.com/how-not-to-use-blogging-software.php#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%... I used Movable Type for a number of projects that went beyond blogging, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youthinside.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, and it worked well -- but if I&#039;d have needed to add more complexity I&#039;d have been up a creek.

A few months ago I bit the (smaller-than-expected) bullet and learned how to use the ExpressionEngine CMS (www.pmachine.com), and have never looked back. I no longer feel like I&#039;m trying to drive in the wrong direction on a one-way street... I was even able to use more complex relational features for a books &amp; quotes section on my blog. Moreover, it was by far the easiest CMS I tried in the area of customizing the design of my sites. I like to design my websites from scratch (very picky about this) &amp; then sprinkle in CMS code wherever necessary, which is exactly what EE lets me do.

I can&#039;t remember where I first heard about ExpressionEngine, but for me, EE has the perfect mix of features vs usability. With a little hacking, this spring I was even able to develop a database-driven multilingual site that served Chinese or Mandarin pages depending on a URL segment, which was marvelous -- it would have been an enormous headache (and likely impossible) to get the same result with a less powerful tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%&#8230; I used Movable Type for a number of projects that went beyond blogging, including <a href="http://www.youthinside.org" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, and it worked well &#8212; but if I&#8217;d have needed to add more complexity I&#8217;d have been up a creek.</p>
<p>A few months ago I bit the (smaller-than-expected) bullet and learned how to use the ExpressionEngine CMS (www.pmachine.com), and have never looked back. I no longer feel like I&#8217;m trying to drive in the wrong direction on a one-way street&#8230; I was even able to use more complex relational features for a books &amp; quotes section on my blog. Moreover, it was by far the easiest CMS I tried in the area of customizing the design of my sites. I like to design my websites from scratch (very picky about this) &amp; then sprinkle in CMS code wherever necessary, which is exactly what EE lets me do.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember where I first heard about ExpressionEngine, but for me, EE has the perfect mix of features vs usability. With a little hacking, this spring I was even able to develop a database-driven multilingual site that served Chinese or Mandarin pages depending on a URL segment, which was marvelous &#8212; it would have been an enormous headache (and likely impossible) to get the same result with a less powerful tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
